Tuesday, April 15, 2008

White Fathers of Silicon Valley

Between the Lions' Gate and the start of the Via Dolorosa in the Old City of Jerusalem lies a wonderful church, dating from Crusader times. Known as the Church of Saint Anne, it is a popular tourist stop because it overlooks the ancient pool of Bethesda, where Jesus healed an ailing man. The church itself, which also served as a madrassa is renowned for its remarkable acoustics, so that any visiting group that sings a hymn can sound like a celestial choir. I once loved visiting there to climb around the ancient pools and hear the tourists singing. My only problem was a statue near the entrance, showing a white monk surrounded by little African children, hugging him and pleading for his blessing. You see, the church is run by an order called the White Fathers of Africa, a group of brethren committed to "saving" the heathen Arabs and Africans. Colonialist condescension is alive and well, if only you know where to look.

It isn't that hard to find either. In a recent article by the BBC, Jimmy Wales speaks of a trip to India, where he met a young man who used Wikipedia to pass an exam. "Wow, that's like really something," he commented, "Here I am standing in a street with mud and a cow and we had touched his life in a positive way. That was pretty cool." While no one denies that poverty has a devastating effect on so many people in so many countries, there seems to be this naïve belief that the answer lies in quirky technological advances—that laptops and wikis will pave the way for a brighter future, and who better to bring them to the miserable masses than the successful white fathers of Silicon Valley.

Rachel Marsden said it better than me when she commented on ValleyWag: "How about we get the "little black kids in Africa" some, oh I don't know, perhaps some RUNNING WATER, and maybe some vaccinations, before we start focusing like uneducated, naive idiots on the fact that they don't have access to the "world's largest compendium of pickup lines"? Mommy's dying of malaria in the corner of the hut, but HEY, life's fabulous because I can read all about how John Seigenthaler killed Kennedy on a computer whose screen I can't see because I have no electricity!"

One hundred years ago, colonial powers and the Church believed that they had all the answers to the problems of the developing world. "Embrace us, and we will save you." Today there are some in Silicon Valley who feel that their gadgetry is the new answer. While I believe that there are wonderful aid organizations out there, I am nonetheless cynical of those who offer solutions without first asking the very people who they are ostensibly trying to help. "What do you need? A goat? Don't have any. How about a laptop?" "Clean water? So passé! Try this wiki instead!"

I'll end with a quote from a book that Erik Möller first introduced to me back in 2002. In The Missionary Position: Mother Teresa in Theory and Practice Christopher Hitchens writes: 'The rich world likes and wishes to believe that someone, somewhere, is doing something for the Third World. For this reason, it does not inquire too closely into the motives or practices of anyone who fulfills, however vicariously, this mandate. The great white hope meets the great black hole; the mission to the heathen blends with the comforting myth of Florence Nightingale. As ever, the true address of the missionary is to the self-satisfaction of the sponsor and the donor, and not to the needs of the downtrodden" (pp. 49–50).

P.S. I have changed the donation widget to reflect Rachel Marsden's comments. Here is a chance to help provide clean water to people in Uganda. Thanks for helping.

19 comments:

The Fieryangel said...

WOW, Danny finally hits the nail right on the head; This is THE QUESTION about Wikipedia. It is colonial and it is WRONG! Thank you for saying this!

Anonymous said...

"Wow, that's like really something." "That's really cool." Can this idiot even speak enough English to help a kid pass his exams?

MessedRocker said...

Oh come on, there are good intentions. There are definitely more important things, but this has a decent place, too.

Of course the Wikimedia Foundation is going to be more interested in education than providing drinking water and shelter. That is its goal in its corporate charter

The Fieryangel said...

Yeah, right guys....Have some more KoolAid....

MessedRocker said...

Look, the obvious resemblance between this and White Man's Burden didn't pass over my head -- and while it is hard to not think of that, I think the intention is right. The execution, a bit questionable.

The Fieryangel said...

Nope, it's right on the money. This IS the central problem with WP...Even Rachel figured it out!

Giggy said...

...the central problem with Wikipedia is that it's not a provider of running water?

Look, I don't think anyone is suggesting that we should be giving computers and wikis to people without electricity...and it they are, then yeah, I think they're probably a bit nuts. But saying that Wikipedia should disappear, as you said here simply because it can't provide water and electricity, is not the best logic I've seen.

Gregory Kohs said...

Another great post, Danny. But let's all try to remember -- the "poor kid in Africa" mantra that gets repeated quite a bit now at the Wikimedia Foundation is merely lip service. If you look at where 95% of the donors' money is going, it's not to Africa, it's not to servers or bandwidth to maintain African-language wikipedias, it's not to schools or workshops on the African continent.

It's going to pay for servers and bandwidth to maintain the crushing traffic on the English Wikipedia, it's going to Sue Gardner, Mike Godwin, and the dozen other do-gooders in the expensive San Francisco office, and it's going to (as we learned here) expensive dinners, wine, and massage parlors -- at least until heads-up staffers like Danny put their foot down, and are subsequently described by salary-taking Sue Gardner as a "disgruntled former employee".

Poor MessedRocker -- falling for it. I'm sure it makes himself feel better for participating in and feeding a corrupt system of governance.

And that's the whole point of the "poor kid in Africa" routine: to make the unpaid automatons feel good about the work they're doing to prop up an unethical system.

Ben Yates said...

Actually, technology can have a profound, non-messed up impact on poor countries if it's done right.

Dismissing every effort to help the third world as colonialist is just as bad as assuming every effort is godly. Read this NYT article: Can the Cellphone Help End Global Poverty? And for some actual light on how tech aid can be done wrong, read Pure Product.

But then, you already know about this stuff, because you're out in the trenches all the time, yes? Or are your posts just mad libs where you write an essay and then slip jimmy wales in at the end as the antagonist. I remember a local maoist zine that ended every article with "and that is why we are fighting for a united vanguard against fascism" (if the writers didn't put it in, the editors would tack it on). Allswool reminds me a little of that.

RDH(Ghost In The Machine) said...

Direct hit on target Danny!

Jimmy, maybe before you get that kid in Africa a laptop so she can have access to the world's largest collection of Pokemon articles, you should get her a cellphone first, so she can order out for pizza.

Hungry kids don't learn well for some reason.

All's Wool that Ends Wool said...

While I respect your opinion, Ben, I do beg to differ as to the terminology Maoist. When I showed your response to a friend of mine--someone who knows a great deal more about Maoism than I do--he pointed me to this article, which is well worth reading: http://www.edge.org/3rd_culture/lanier06/lanier06_index.html

One of the great advantages of this era is our ability to challenge accepted norms with relative impunity. We no longer get stoned for saying "That piece of fish was good enough for Jehovah" (Monty Python reference for the truly ignorant)," or even for questioning the morality of Jehovah and his representatives. We are lucky that we can challenge accepted "truths" or question the motives of our leaders, and we should take advantage of that.

As for the essence of this post, I was truly bothered by Jimmy's comment, as quoted by the BBC. It indicated to me--and to some others, as well--a level of condescension toward the people he is ostensibly trying to help. To be clear, I believe that technological education will assist developing nations: in fact, until just today, I appealed on this very page for people to support computer literacy in Guatemala and Sri Lanka. My question is twofold: 1) Is JW/WMF really helping the needy or simply making statements of intent with no real backing behind them? and 2) Is what JW/WMF suggest really the best way to help?

Believe it or not, I really am grateful to Erik for pointing out the obvious to me. Behind the media hype that shapes our perception of even the saintliest people--the Mother Teresas of the world (see the earliest history of that article to understand what I mean)--there often lies another story that should be considered ... even if it means slaughtering a herd of sacred cows. Greater than the harm of questions is the danger of unsatisfactory answers.

Anonymous said...

Oh what a load of crap!

If you are doing something that happens to also help the faraway poor ... then you're doing something wrong because you're not doing something MORE to help the poor? So therefore if you do nothing at all, you won't get criticized at all. Great incentive you're giving out, Danny!

Wikipedia provides information, not water, not vaccinations. Rachel Marsden's comments are ridic -- wait a minute, why, oh why, would Rachel Marsden want to criticize Wikipedia and Jimmy? What a mystery.

No doubt, Danny, you'll go right out to the Third World now and devote your life to helping the poorest of the poor ... sounds like that woman that Christopher Hitchens can't bash hard enough. What exactly has Christopher Hitchens been doing for the poorest? Providing clean water and vaccinations?

If you have a problem with missionaries being missionaries, recall that they're acting on the general direction of Jesus. Or maybe your argument is with Jesus. They think they have some knowledge about salvation to give to those who don't have it -- that's not necessarily colonial/imperial/pick-whatever-fashionable-derogatory-term-you-want-and-put-it-here. If there was much more to it than that, you didn't convey it in your post.

Believe me, I value your blog and don't have anything against you, but this post was just cranky crap.

All's Wool that Ends Wool said...

Yes, but I do have a lot of problems with missionaries being missionaries. They don't have the best track record now, do they?

MessedRocker said...

"Poor MessedRocker -- falling for it. I'm sure it makes himself feel better for participating in and feeding a corrupt system of governance."

I've always had disdain for the WMF playing the Africa card when it came to fundraising -- it's nothing but a heart-wrenching fundraiser tactic. This can especially be seen when outreach projects have to be cut off because the fundraiser did not raise enough money.

I was thinking of OLPC, which has a greater chance at having some impact in 3rd world countries BECAUSE IT IS ACTUALLY A HUMANITARIAN ORGANIZATION. (At least it's more of a humanitarian organization than the Wikimedia Foundation is.)

Anonymous said...

"Yes, but I do have a lot of problems with missionaries being missionaries. They don't have the best track record now, do they?"

I'm beginning to see where you're coming from. Actually, they certainly do have the "best track record" if you take an overall look at Christian missionary activity. Many of them were martyred; many, many of them did and are doing an enormous amount of good in the world. If you think the record is overall bad or even just "mixed", then look into it further, and remember that missionary activity has been going on since the First Century.

All that said, it's entirely possible that the WMF is using African children for WMF's fundraising purposes, but if that's the real nub of it, then it would be better to stick to that rather than trash the concept of missionary work.

All's Wool that Ends Wool said...

It would make no sense for me to get into an argument about Christian missionary movements or their track record. Our very basic assumptions are different, as I see no value but do see harm in spreading the "Gospel" and imposing religious beliefs upon others. Let's just say that I am certainly not a Christian.

Kenali dan Kunjungi Objek Wisata di Pandeglang said...

Kenali dan Kunjungi Objek Wisata di Pandeglang
Keyword Kenali Pandeglang
Mohon dukungannya yach....?!
Semangat..semangat..!!
Pandeglang telah hilang Kenali Si Dunia Aneh
Silahkan kunjungi Pak firman di SDIT Nurul Ilmi Medan dalam kontes Kenali dan Kunjungi Objek Wisata di Pandeglang

Adi said...

Oes Tsetnoc one of the ways in which we can learn seo besides Mengembalikan Jati Diri Bangsa. By participating in the Oes Tsetnoc or Mengembalikan Jati Diri Bangsa we can improve our seo skills. To find more information about Oest Tsetnoc please visit my Oes Tsetnoc pages. And to find more information about Mengembalikan Jati Diri Bangsa please visit my Mengembalikan Jati Diri Bangsa pages. Thank you So much.
Oes Tsetnoc | Semangat Mengembalikan Jati Diri Bangsa

elizabeth bernot said...

Costa Rica Fishing

http://www.fishingcostaricaexperts.com/

Fishing Costa Rica